# Difference between revisions of "Research area"

(→. Classic complex solutions) |
(→. The key ideea) |
||

(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||

Line 26: | Line 26: | ||

</haskell> |
</haskell> |
||

− | Of course, f is the semantic function, in this case the addition. |
||

+ | See more examples here on the page of [[Modular Monadic Compilers for Programming Languages]]. |
||

==. Why this solution is so interesting == |
==. Why this solution is so interesting == |
||

Line 60: | Line 60: | ||

See the [[Rodin]] project. |
See the [[Rodin]] project. |
||

... |
... |
||

− | Find some basics and news in [[Practica |
+ | Find some basics and news in [[Practica interpretarii monadice]]. (Ro - book) |

+ | |||

+ | ==. Modular Monadic Type-Checking == |
||

+ | Will be added... |
||

==. Modular Monadic Compilation == |
==. Modular Monadic Compilation == |

## Latest revision as of 08:50, 26 July 2011

## Contents

## . The Expression Problem

In 1998 P.Wadler had defined "The Expresion Problem" (accordingly to Wouter Swierstra - Data types a la carte ).

"The goal is to define a data type by case, where one can add new cases to the data type and new functions over the dat a type , without recompiling existing code, and while retaining static type safety."

Ten years later a simple and clear solution (2008) was given by Dan Popa User:Ha$kell in a speech scheduled for AngloHaskell/2008 http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/AngloHaskell/2008
You may download the presentation from http://www.haskell.org/wikiupload/1/1d/Prezentare-Anglo-Haskell-2008-draft2-more-slides.pdf

## . The key ideea

Those monadic replacements for data constructors are simultaneously **syntax and semantics** and works with every monad !

The main ideea is extremely simple: a data constructor as those defined in a data declaration can be replaced with something like:

```
plus x y = do { valueofx <- x;
valueofy <- y;
return (f x y) }
where (f) = (+)
```

See more examples here on the page of Modular Monadic Compilers for Programming Languages.

## . Why this solution is so interesting

And why it is so simple and clear ?Let's see:

- it did not use a fixpoint operator !!
- it did not use a Maybe (high level embeded) type !!
- it did not propose a Haskell extension !!
- it did not use
**data**declaration anymore !! - as a consequence it did not use Data Constructors anymore !!
- it is introducing
*pseudoconstructors over monadic values*because the chain of unevaluated (yet) functions is actually forming a datastructure . do not forget that Haskell is a lazy evaluation language !! - because it is usable in a large sort of projects involving modular trees and modular monadic semantics (on every monad)
- because we used it succesfuly for modular:
- evaluators
- typecheckers : references will be added
- compilers :Modular Monadic Compilers for Programming Languages

## . Why this solution is valuable .

- because we have already built modular languages like Rodin using it.
- because it works with just a bit overloading of the system : See final pages of http://www.haskell.org/wikiupload/1/1d/Prezentare-Anglo-Haskell-2008-draft2-more-slides.pdf
- because it is modular
- because language construction tools are valuable software (1000$ a Licence for a good language generator.)
- because it fits in the previous kind of systems with truee small modifications (just replace a single letter of a data constructor to transform it in a pseudoconstructor ...)
- the modular typecheckers can also be build using this tech.
- because my Ph.D Superviser is wishing to sell custom languages with a price of aprox 10 000$ / language - or at least he declared this some times ago.

References: see the .pdf of the latest papers from User:Ha$kell's homepage. Ill be back. Download and read the latest papers of Dan Popa from User:Ha$kell's homepage.

## . Modular Monadic Interpretation

See the Rodin project. ... Find some basics and news in Practica interpretarii monadice. (Ro - book)

## . Modular Monadic Type-Checking

Will be added...

## . Modular Monadic Compilation

See Modular Monadic Compilers for Programming Languages, this page from 2011.

## . References

Dan Popa, "Modular evaluation and interpreters using monads and type classes in Haskell" , Studii si Cercetari Ştiinţifice, Seria Matematica, Univ. Bacău, (18) 2008. An Open Office (.sxw) file *including example code* is available here:
Download .sxw After loading the .sxw in the Open Office, press the PDF button from the toolbar to produce your own .pdf file. Or
Official PDF of the paper for <DOWNLOAD> , having the following title:

Direct modular evaluation of expressions using the monads and type classes in Haskell by DAN V. POPA UNIVERSITATEA DIN BACĂU STUDII ŞI CERCETĂRI ŞTIINŢIFICE Seria: MATEMATICĂ Un draft al lucrarii Adaptable Software - Modular Extensible Monadic Entry-pointless Type Checker in Haskell by Dan Popa , Ro/Haskell Group, Univ. “V.Alecsandri”, Bacau este aici: download Nr. 18 (2008), pag. 233 – 248

The paper is introducing Pseudoconstructors over monadic values as a way of building modular trees without data or Haskell extensions. http://www.haskell.org/wikiupload/7/7d/POPA_D.pdf. Modular adaptable interpreters for extensible languages - like Rodin - become now easy to build, without the need of any Haskell extensions.

Adaptable Software - Modular Extensible Monadic Entry-pointless Type Checker in Haskell by Dan Popa , Ro/Haskell Group, Univ. “V.Alecsandri”, Bacau <DOWNLOAD> in .ps format
The paper was (on 27th of may 2011) presented to the NCMI 2011 Conference, in Bacau.

more ... will be added

## . 'Dotted' list of references:

[1] http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Pseudoconstructors_over_monadic_values They have a page here, but only paragraph #7 is in English now.

[2] Something in English http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Research_area

[3] A paper , where the main simple ideea is at the base of page http://www.haskell.org/wikiupload/7/7d/POPA_D.pdf

[4] The draft of a presentation http://www.haskell.org/wikiupload/1/1d/Prezentare-Anglo-Haskell-2008-draft2-more-slides.pdf (maybe a good point to start)

...